|
Russian Revolution's Forum
E-books World history, Rus' history and Religions history
Modernization of Russia
Holy Russia - Third Rome The new subject of international law, the State Holy Russia - Third Rome, 21.09.2013. | Nova Church of Holy Russia Orthodoxy and Christianity require reforming and release of heresy and obscurantism. 21.09.2011. | The Seljuk Dynasty Origin New!!! The author put forward a hypothesis according to which the Seljuk’s Sultans came from the Princes of the Russ – Rurikovich Kin, who eventually converted to Islam. The hypothesis was fully confirmed by the identification of the main historical figures of the Seljuk dynasty with the descendants of the Princes St. Vladimir and Yaroslav the Wise. We are talking about the rulers of Sultanate of Rum Sultan Suleiman and his descendants, as well as Tuqaq, Seljuk, Mikail, Israel, Toghrul, Alp Arslan and other Sultans. Princes and their sons from the Principality of Tmutarakan became Seljuk’s Sultans, from where they conquered the countries and peoples of the Caucasus, Iran, Asia Minor and Central Asia. 24.05–12.06.2023. | Synchronization of historical and religious Chronicles The author correctly synchronizes historical and religious Chronicles of the Ancient World based on a short chronology and linking events to unique celestial phenomena reflected in the annals and Scriptures. The author believes that discrepancies in dates, geographical localities and ethnic origin of historical and religious figures are due to erroneous traditional chronology and historical geography, as well as the deliberate adaptation of phenomena and events to an established paradigm. 20.04–25.05.2020. | Astronomical dating of Biblical events The author's reconstruction of the history and chronology of religions is fully verified by identifying 15 celestial phenomena described in the Chronicles, including 11 Solar Eclipses, 3 Zodiacs and 1 Supernova. A chronological shift of 1780 years in the history of Ancient Egypt has been confirmed for 6 phenomena, including 3 Solar Eclipses and 3 Zodiacs, including the Eclipse of Pharaoh Takelot on August 8, 891. Astronomically confirmed the date of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ as March 18, 1010, and the date of death of Ibrahim – the son of the Prophet Muhammad as February 7, 1152 (28 Shawwal 546 AH). 20.02–31.03.2020. | Origin of the gens Rurik After the break of ties between the metropolis and the Russian principalities, the annals of Byzantium were cleared of the mention of "foreigners" in the management of the Empire, and the Chronicles of Russia did not have time to properly reflect the role of Rurik in world history. A study of the sources of Ancient Rome, New Rome, Russia, Arab countries, Danube and Volga Bulgaria allowed the author to identify the Russ gens and Bulgarian Khagans with the Flavian dynasty, as well as to identify Rurik, his descendants and relatives from the Macedonian dynasty (IX–XI century) and dynasty of Lecapenus (X century). The last Russian Emperor of New Rome been Yaroslav the Wise, throne name Constantine Monomachos. 11.09–21.10.2019. | Chronology of monotheistic religions The author identified the Patriarchs of monotheism with well-known figures of human history. He proved that the oldest religion of monotheism is Christianity, which had a theoretical character in the I Millennium (Old Testament Christianity) and a practical embodiment at the beginning of the II Millennium (New Testament Christianity). Islam and Judaism emerged only in the early VII century and became radical branches of Christianity. Based on the study of solar eclipses, the author has determined the date and place of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ (March 18, 1010 in Constantinople), the year of the death of the Prophet Muhammad (1152) and the period creation of the Quran (1130–1152). 01–27.08.2019. | Localization of Ancient Rome The history of Ancient Rome is well studied, but hides a lot of inconsistencies and contradictions relating to the period of formation of the city and the expansion of the Romans into the world. We believe that the problems are caused by ignorance of the true localization of Ancient Rome in the Volga region on Akhtuba until the Fire on 64 and move city to location of Veii in Italy. The article also considers the aspects of ethnic origin of the peoples of the Latin League, Ancient Rome and Europe. The vector of expansion of Ancient Rome from the Volga region to the Europe coinciding with the migration flows of the Migration Period and the spread of PIE is substantiated. In addition the article considers the dynamics of growth and decline of the population of Ancient Rome in the localities from its inception to sunset and transformation. 23.06–16.07.2019. | Short chronology of Ancient Egypt The history of Ancient Egypt generated in XIX century, every day finds out all greater discrepancy to modern realities both the newest archeological and tool data, including results of DNA researches of mummies of the Egyptian pharaohs. The chronology of Egypt as whole is considered well investigated and however it has been created for substantiation of an antiquity of Jewish people, instead of for scientific description of one of most ancient terrestrial civilizations. Author's reconstruction of chronology of Ancient Egypt has found out time shift at rate 1780 years in depth of centuries from true dating events. 1-16.06.2019. | Great Tartary or Slavic Empire The next riddle of world historiography is solved. Present clause is devoted to history and modern condition of one of the most grandiose empires of terrestrial civilization – Great Tartary or Slavic Empires. 04–19.09.2017. | The European Aryans In present clause the broad audience of the questions connected to probable Aryan origin of various European peoples is considered. Including aspects of possible an Aryan origin of Slavs and prospects of presence by these of special way to world around are considered. 25.02.2017 - 24.03.2017. | Summarizing of Zemsky Sobor 2016 (Land Assembly 2016) Within the framework of carrying out Zemsky Sobor 2016 (Land Assembly 2016) on elections of Grand Prince of All Russia four Nominees have been put forward. The overwhelming majority of voices have been given for Nominee Grand Prince Valeriy Viktorovich Kubarev. Will of God and decision of participants of Assembly, Zemsky Sobor 2016 has elected lifelong Grand Prince of All Russia Valeriy Viktorovich Kubarev Grand Kubensky Rurikovich. 11.05.2016. | Yaroslavl’s Princes Rurikovich In clause is described family tree of Grand Princes of Yaroslavl and their descendants, it is the senior branch of the Kin of Russ – Rurikovich, going back to Mstislav Great Monomachos. Kin of the Grand Princes of Yaroslavl have continued by Princes Grand Kubensky – Kubarev. 22.02.2016–11.03.2016. | All truth about Saint Prince Vladimir In clause the all truth about Saint Prince Vladimir which is ignored Orthodox and Romanov’s historians, communistic historical science and their modern adepts, fabricating myths about Russ with « good intentions » opens without denominations. The kin of Russ - Rurikovich has created Orthodoxy and the Russian statehood, Russian people began to forget about it. Glory to Russ! 07-17.07.2015. | Brief chronology of religions The report at XXX International conference on problems of the Civilization, 25.04.2015, Moscow, RosNoU. In the clause the final Chronological Tables of Ancient Egypt, Ancient and New Rome, Rome in Italy, Christianity, Islam and Judaism are submitted. 25.04.2015. | Canons of Orthodoxy of XIV century and the present time The report at XXIX International conference on problems of the Civilization, 20.12.2014, Moscow, RosNoU. In the report the comparative analysis of canons of Orthodoxy of XIV century (1315-1321), displayed on mosaics and frescos of Church of Chorus in Istanbul, and modern doctrines are made. Numerous differences of events of the Holy Legend and the Gospel of the past and the present are found out. 20.12.2014. | Ethnic threats to peoples of Russia In clause political, economic, cultural and religious aspects of consequences of ethnic opposition of radical peoples of Russia and new coming Slavic population formed as result of violent Slavic expansion in Russia in days of the Mongolian yoke are considered. The historical reasons of occurrence of ethnic contradictions are investigated, estimations of modern condition of problem (Chechelevskaya and Lubotinskaya Republics in 1905, Donetsk national republic and Lugansk national republic in 2014 in territory of Ukraine) are given and offers on decrease in escalation of ethnic opposition in territory of Eurasia are made. 09.06 - 05.07.2014. | Attribution of Rurikovich and Emperors Lecapenus The report at XXVIII International Conference on problems of the Civilization is 26.04.2014, Moscow, RosNoU. In clause it is described detailed attribution of Ugrian Tsars with Emperors of Ancient and New Rome and Patriarches of terrestrial civilization. It is scientifically proved origins of all patriarches of monotheism and Emperors Flavius and Lecapenus from kint of Ugrian Tsars of Russ (Great), is the ethnic Finn-Ugrian from Volga region. 23.03.2014 – 24.04.2014. | Putin's Eurasian impasse Vladimir Putin and Uniform Russia realize the Eurasian project, involving Russia and Russian people during stagnation and backlogs from World Civilization. They create Gog and Magog Empire, menacing to world peace. Why the Kremlin authority has not asked Russian Slavs – they want to live in the Asian country or to be safe Europeans? 14-22.01.2014. | Projections of the God in symbols of religion As result of studying the extensive visual material created by 3D modeling, we have proved existence of uniform source of an origin of Projections of the God, that is religious symbolic of people. The source or quantum object refers to the Chariot of the God. We believe that on the basis of our researches, it will be possible to organize training to travel on the Universe of space navigators from the most gifted people and to create spaceships with engines as the described quantum generator is Chariots of the God or the Chariot of Cube. 25–30.08.2013. | Origin and migration of Slavs Historical and genetic routes of migrations of the Slavs, calculated with the help from ancient Byzantium, European, Chinese, Arabian, Bulgarian and Russian chronicles and annals, and also modern researches of man's DNA chromosomes. 01-21.05.2013. | Empires of cousins of Russ The report at scientific XXVI International conference on problems of the Civilization 26-27.04.2013, Moscow, RosNoU. In article five world Empires of cousins of Russ (Great) existing in our era on open spaces of Eurasia with cyclicity of occurrence once in 300 years are described. | Hungarian Kingdom of Russ It is continuation of research of dynastic communications of Rurikovich. Cousin of Rurik Almysh/Almos and his children Kazan/Kurszan and Arbat/Arpad, it is all ethnic Ugrian of Russ, have based at the end of IX century – beginning of X century the Hungarian kingdom of Russ, having grasped Great Moravia. 08-11.01.2013. | Reconstruction of dynastic communications of Rurikovich in IX-XI centuries Report at anniversary scientific XXV International conference on problems of civilization at 21-22.12.2012, RosNoU, Moscow. Corrected at 03.01.2013. | Educated Christianity of Russ Bible – the Old Testament and the New Testament has exhausted itself. Forged the Scripts and the Sacred Legend cannot serve more as a spiritual reference point for promotion of mankind forward on the river of time. It is allowable to use only spiritual – moral potential of the ancient products being product of national creativity of Jews and Catholics, instead of divine revelations. The chronology of Bible events, an ethnic accessory of patriarchs of mankind, names, geography and original languages of heroes of the Bible do not correspond to the validity. Bible miracles have the quantum nature in the basis and submit to laws of a universe. Educated Christianity of Russ restore the religious both destroyed obscurantists religious and scientific knowledge of Christianity and revolutionary role of religion in history of civilization. 26.08. – 12.10.2012. | True Empty Tomb Nova Church of Sacred Russia and Sacred Russ, Princes of Russia congratulates mankind on presence of True Empty Tomb and restoration of the religious and historical truth. The true has triumphed forever. 20-29.05.2012. | Orthodoxy and Islam in Old Russia The report at XXIV International scientific conference on problems of the Civilization in Russian New University on April 20-21, 2012. | Day of Church Slavonic writing. Russ Cyril and Methodius. In this significant holiday of Day of Church Slavonic writing and remembering Equal Apostles Sacred Cyril and Methodius, Princes of Russ convincingly ask Russian Orthodox Church and the public of the orthodox countries to return to sources and correctly to name the writing, language and church books Russian, but not Slavic. Ancient Russia was the Finno-Ugric state created by Russ Christians Rurik and Igor, Cyril and Methodius, Askold and Dir, Prophetic Oleg and Sacred Olga, Sacred Vladimir and Empress Anna Macedonian.
24.05.2011. | Wars of Russ in IX-XI centuries In article on a rich actual material it is shown, that all wars of Russ with Byzantium in 836-1043 have been connected to deduction of a throne of empire by Russian party of Constantinople headed by the Macedonian dynasty of Russ. To the author it is proved, that two centuries co-emperors of New Rome were Great Princes Rurikovich. Last Russian emperor Jaroslav Mudry known in Tsar Grad as Constantine Monomakh was. The report at scientific XXII International conference on problems of the Civilization 22-23.04.2011, Moscow, RosNoU. | Genetic distances between cousins Rurikovich The report at scientific XXII International Conference on problems of the Civilization, on April 22-23, 2011, RosNoU, Moscow, Russia. 24.04.2011. | Slavic-Mongolian invasion to Russia Results of our research of an origin of Slavs have not simply scientific, but political value. In view of the received data it is necessary to form the weighed policy of interethnic and inter religious attitudes in Russia and the world. The modern hobby of Russian Slavs Rodoverie, the Aries origin and the contemptuous attitude to inhabitants of Central Asia, Caucasus, Mongolia, China and other regions of the world bears a system and logic mistake. Rodoverie in general it is senseless, in fact ancestors Rodoverian in Russia and Ukraine have left Central Asia and were Kirghiz, Altaian’s, Tajik’s, Pashtun’s, Uyghur’s and Juan-Juan, and completely not blond demigods. 12-18.03.2011. | Old Rome and Italic union of the Volga region The scientific article on an extensive historical material proves that Ancient Rome has been created by Finno-Ugric tribe’s of Italic union of the Volga region (Idel, Bulgar). Italic peoples Vestini (Vesi), Marsi (Merya), Lucani (Lucane), Marrucini (Marri) and others till now live on Volga. Finno-Ugric named Latinas (Latinyanami) German peoples of the Volga region, differently Altyn-ami that means Gold literally. Fortress Alba Longo was called Altynbash, and Volga region Rome – Ulak-Urum. Southwest capital of Finno-Ugric of Idel was city Phanagoria or the Finn–Ugoria, being in antiquities capital Bosporus Empire and Great Bulgaria was. The web of lies of the western falsifiers of history how many would not be twisted, but to it all the same there comes the end. 10-21.02.2011. | Correct genographic We have proved fidelity Bulgarian theory of an origin of mankind. She proves to be true a natural vector of moving of people on a planet from the Volga region in all parties of Eurasia, and there from to Africa, Australia and America. All peoples and races of the world have taken place from Hindi-European, namely – from ethnic Finno-Ugric. 01-07.02.2011. | Correct DNA-Genealogy and glottochronology Scientific article of Grand Prince Valeriy Kubarev on DNA-Genealogy and glottochronology is submitted to your attention. The author has created formulas with which help it is possible to define precisely time of life of the general ancestor and an epoch of formation of various languages. These formulas have received the name of Kubarev’s formula. With the help of mathematical calculations, Valeriy Kubarev has proved fidelity Barrow of Hypothesis of Maria Gimbutas and own reconstruction of a history of the world. We hope that results of research will find wide application in DNA-Genealogy and glottochronology. 04-14.01.2011. | Genealogy and genetics of Princes of Russia The report of Grand Prince Valeriy Kubarev at XXI International Conference on problems of the Civilization 25.12.2010. Valeriy Kubarev's scientific article describes genetics of Rurikovich and Sorts of Russia. Grand Prince has scientifically defined modal haplotype of Rurik, Gedimin, Russ Aydar, Kubrat, Flavius and has theoretically described modal haplotype of Alexander Great, Jesus Christ Zlatoust, Prophet Mohammed and Genghis Khan. All these well-known people ethnically Finno-Ugrian from the Sort of Russ. 25.12.2010. | What do we celebrate on November 4? Loss of the national sovereignty... National voting or voting of national representatives is unacceptable for elections of Tsar and Grand Duke, in fact tsar from the God, and the voice of people is not a voice Divine. Elections of Grand Duke only voting of Princes – patrimonial aristocracy of Russia are possible. 08-21.11.2010. | Turn of the Earth promptly comes nearer This is article with the analysis of abnormal geophysical and climatic activity on a planet. 09-12.09.2010. | Baltavar – a symbol of Christianity, an Islam and Judaism Petrarca: « When people will address to the history, his greatness come to live »
30-31.03.2010 | History of Russ about 3506 BC till 2012 Kubarev V.V.'s report, History of Russ about 3506 BC till 2012.
Section «Civilization aspects of the Russian history and chronology».
Tenth International scientific conference «Civilization of knowledge: global crisis and an innovative choice of Russia», Moscow, April 24-25, 2009, RosNOU. | Archive 2006-2018 |
Whose fault is it?
The Catechon Paradigm as an instrument of the Antichrist New!!! In the article, the author examines the current state of the catechon paradigm and the practice of using the provisions of the concept in the political and public life of the Russian Federation. According to the author, the idea of the catechon in Russia was intercepted by the forces of evil and used as a screen to cover their deeds. Today, the catechon paradigm has become an instrument of the Antichrist and his adherents to gain world domination. The only resource for Lucifer’s conquest of the world is sinful people whom he can attract under his banners. As successful as his deception and seduction will be, so strong and numerous will be the army of Satan. 05–17.12.2022. | Impairment of Orthodoxy New!!! In the article, the author has carried out a retrospective analysis of the events and processes that led to the impairment and transformation of the canons of Orthodoxy and the patristic tradition of Russian Christianity. Prohibitions and reliance on the good intentions of opportunists within the body of the church led to a natural distortion of the teaching. As a result, the Orthodox Church became vulnerable to the pressure of Lucifer's lies and deception and ceased to be a source of life. 30.09–25.11.2022. | Features of Christianity in Cappadocia New!!! The usual facts for Cappadocia were the proximity of male and female Monasteries and their communication. The plots and frescoes of the Churches were created no earlier than the first quarter of the XI century. The isomorphic images of St. George, Theodore Stratelates and Theodore Tiron have come down to us. According to the author, St. George became a collective image of the Saints Constantine the Great and the two Theodores. The fresco of the Serpent Church depicts Onuphrius the Great as a hermaphrodite, which the Church is trying to forget. On the face of the purposeful distortion by Christianity of the Holy Tradition, led by the Holy Spirit, and the removal from the original sources. 05–28.08.2022. | Emperors Lekapenos(920–945) Based on a thorough analysis of the chronicles of New Rome, Ancient Russia, Great Bulgaria and Arab sources, the author has justified the Finno–Ugric origin of the Macedonian Dynasty and the Lekapenos Dynasty. The details of the biographies, names, dates of rule and family ties of dozens of Emperors, Khagans and Princes of Byzantium, Russ and Bulgar coincide with great accuracy, which makes it possible to identify all the studied personalities with real historical figures. In local chronicles, they have different or identical names, depending on the national characteristics of the nicknames of the studied persons. 07.12.2020–30.01.2021. | Dancing on bones (people losses of USSR in SWW) We have found out the facts of direct falsification of human losses of military men and civil persons of the USSR within the Second World War in some millions person. Forgery is caused by activity of the propaganda machine of the USSR and false understanding of patriotism in modern Russia. By our calculations true irrevocable losses of the population of the USSR within the SWW make 7.6–8.7 million persons from among military men and the general losses with civil people 12.8–13.9 million persons. Have run away from Stalin paradise of USSR is hundred thousand (up to 1.3 million) the persons. We believe that the name of each victim of war should be taken into account and sounded publicly. 04–18.05.2019. | Expansion of Rome from Volga region The report at XXXIII International conference on problems of the Civilization, 24.12.2016, Moscow, RosNoU. In the report the extensive information on resettlement of peoples to Europe through ports of Bosporan Kingdom and Bosporus to the Mediterranean from the Volga region, Siberia and Caucasus during existence of Ancient Rome in delta of the rivers Volga and Akhtuba since VI century B.C. up to middle of VI century is submitted. 24.12.2016. | Seleucus and tribal leaders of Rome The report at scientific XXXI International Conference on problems of the Civilization has acted on December 26, 2015, RosNoU, Moscow, Russia. In the report the hypothesis that "Macedonian" gains of IV century B.C. actually are the first wave of expansion of Ancient Rome and resettlement of peoples on South, East and West from territory of the Volga region and Caucasus is put forward and proved. 26.12.2015. | Picturesque Gospel of Church of Chora (Kariye) in Istanbul Research of artifacts of Church of the Christ Savior in Chora (Church of Chorus, XIV century, Istanbul) has allowed restoring overlooked nuances of ancient doctrines of Byzantium Orthodoxy. The numerous facts of distortion Holy Book and Holy Legend have been found out at formation of modern Christian canons which at all are not an inviolable reality from above, and there is product of human creativity. 15.09–08.10.2014. | Images ancient Romans from Volga in artefacts Long millennia in Idel-Rome-Memphis-Mitsraim-Itil-Saray-Batu lived from 600 000 up to one million person. Ruins of city are grandiose pantry of a history, culture and religion. Masonic scientists diligently avoid carrying out there scale excavation. In those places prospers only black selector of treasures. How long it is possible to hide to world elite of impostors true from people? 20-22.04.2010. | Archive 2004-2018 |
What to do?
Sixth and other questions New!!! Why doesn't the ROC want to stop the war? 14.02.2022. | Five questions to the ROC New!!! The first question: What is the data of the Birth of Christ now?
The second question: When and where was Jesus Christ crucified?
The third question: When will the Apocalypse begin?
Fourth question: Why Tartarus and the Kingdom of The Beast located in Russia?
The fifth question: When did Vladimir Putin become the receptacle of the Beast? 24-27.01.2022. | The Prophet Muhammad and the Quran Based on an independent analysis of artifacts, ancestral tree and astronomical phenomena related to the deeds, life and death of the Prophet Muhammad, as well as historical evidence of the first appearance and legal use of the Quran in the life of Muslims, the author drew conclusions about the integration of several historical figures of the VII and XII centuries into the personality of the Prophet Muhammad. They became Khagan Kubrat, aka Emperor Heraclius, the Arabian Prophet or Caliph of the Rashidun Caliphs and the true Prophet Muhammad, who lived in 1090–1052. The Quran was created in 1130–1152. The proposed interpretation does not undermine the canons of the faith of Islam, but establishes the truth. 11–30.11.2021. | Syncing the chronicles of Rome and Egypt Based on a thorough analysis of details of military campaigns and astronomical phenomena from the chronicles of Ancient and New Rome, Ancient Egypt and Persian sources, the author confirmed the chronological shift in the history of Ancient Egypt by 1780 years in the past. The author also revealed the complot of historians to conceal the existence of Ancient Egypt in I millennium by masking the deeds of the Egyptian Pharaohs of the New Kingdom for the non-existent activity of the Kings of the Sasanian Empire. 06–29.03.2021. | The identification of the Patriarchs with historical figures The author correctly identifies the Patriarchs of monotheistic religions with historical figures of the past based on the paradigm of a short chronology of the world and linking events to unique celestial phenomena reflected in Chronicles and Scriptural. The identification of the Patriarchs is based on the analysis of data from the genealogical trees of Jesus Christ from Lucas, Matthew, mosaics of the Church of Chora, the genealogical tree of the Prophet Muhammad and lists of the Kings of the Great Bulgaria. 21.07–27.08.2020. | Pure Relationship We have found out and have proved that at everyone men are two direct lines of Pure Relationship on which in each generation of ancestors he has only one pair pure relatives – the forefather and the foremother. All other ancestors are the listed relatives. We also have proved that each woman has two direct lines of Pure Relationship on which in each generation of ancestors it has only one pair foremothers. On the basis of research we confirm De Facto firmness of the absolute law of succession is rule Lex Salica of Pure Relationship. 05.08 – 03.09.2014. | Archive 2004-2018 |
To be continued...
Thoughts aloud: Religion
Thoughts aloud: Politics
Thoughts aloud: Advice
Thoughts aloud
To be continued...
|
|
|
|
Valery KUBAREV > Modernization of Russia > Genealogy and genetics of Princes of Russia
Genealogy and genetics of Princes of Russia |
The report at scientific XXI International Conference on problems of the Civilization, 25.12.2010, RosNoU, Moscow. Genealogy and genetics of Princes of Russia The genealogy of Princes of Russia and Rurikovich for hundreds years has got the politized character caused by aspiration Imperial House of Romanovs to provide to authority of authority, seized by them in 1613 by actual revolution. Thus last years the genealogy of princely sorts has received additional opportunities by use of the scientific genetic toolkit which in any way has been not connected to a policy and a fashion. Definition haplotype became accessible and from the economic point of view. The Fund of Assistance to the National and Religious Consent of Princes has opened the scientific program on studying haplotype people being lineal descendants Rurikovich and Princes of Russia. The present work is devoted to summarizing of research haplotype on an accessory to family Rjurikovich of participants of the international project of company Family Tree DNA under name Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project [1]. The project head from the Polish party was the extensive database about more than 200 people who counts itself, in conformity with family tradition, descendants legendary Rurik [2] is collected. Directly some descendants of Princes of Russia have taken part in the program of Fund of Princes from founders and participants of Fund (Appendix 1 and 2) already. For the analysis the data haplotype still the several people, directly not considering themselves descendants Rurik, but Princes of the Sort of Russia actually being descendants have been involved. 1. A modern condition of studying Rurikovich The question is in detail described in works [3-4]. Last years fast rates genetic researches of people develop. Population the genetics in aspects of studying of the past was divided into three disciplines: genic chronology, genic genealogy and genic geography. Genetics are based on studying of genetic markers of the person. There are the markers not influencing biological features of people and transmitted only from the father to the son – they are allocated in a Y-chromosome. In view of studying descendants of the person who has conceived the whole dynasty of Princes and tsars, it is interesting to define his initial modal haplotype. In our case it is important to allocate haplotype Rurik which was the founder cluster haplotype, revealed by results of testing the certain sample of people. Cluster includes modal haplotype and haplotype, connected with it through set generation and mutations. Time of event of birth Rurik refers to The tame to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) or time of a life of general ancestor Rurikovich is simple. Thus is accepted, that the general ancestor just and was the carrier modal haplotype. Creation of sample tested is an area of statistical DNA-RESEARCHES of probable relatives. Dating of a life of the general ancestor begins with allocation cluster haplotype. In cluster haplotype the number of single-step mutations in relation to modal haplotype (sometimes it name base) pays off. The received value shares for speed of mutations. The result gives time of a life of the general ancestor. Usually duration of an interval between generations accepted for 25 years. We believe these calculations inexact. In case Rurikovich it is necessary to take a longitude of generation for 34 years. Calculations of speed of mutations, in our opinion erroneous, are made in article [4]. However they give the general representations about a subject of conversation. Initially the estimation of speed of mutations and the formula of its calculation is offered to A.A. Klyosov in article [5]:
ln (B/A) = kt, where: B – total haplo;
A – number kept modal / base haplotype (haplotype a primogenitor);
k – speed of mutations;
t – number of generations up to the general ancestor.
For example, on article [3]: « For 12 markers haplotype and speeds of mutations equal 0,002 on a marker on generation, for Rurik on TH, B/A = 3.02, for Rurik on NH FiN, B/A = 2.15 » Now there are two points of view for studying genealogy and genetics Rurikovich and Princes of Russia. The first, traditional version is supported by the Russian genealogic federation, the Historical-genealogical society in Moscow, the Russian Nobiliary Assembly, Romanov's Imperial House and international project Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project. Results of their work are resulted in publications [2, 6-8]. Despite of optimistic mood of authors of scientific researches, results of researches result in a shock of unbiased scientists. Results are looked simply absolutely absurdly and evidently illustrate juggling of the scientists, compelled to guarantee the necessary result approved by sponsors of grants. Affirms, that Rurik ostensibly was born in vicinities of Stockholm in Sweden at coast Roslagen (to the north from Stockholm), and there from has arrived to Ladoga, therefore Rurik and his relatives have the Scandinavian origin. Thus in works [1-2] it is evidently shown, that than 8 % of found out descendants Rurik live in Sweden less, and the most part are in Russia and Finland (Table of moving Rurikovich). Then at Rurik there should be relatives in Sweden with modal haplotype, therefore there their quantity should be maximal, but it not so. Besides Rurikovich ethnically are Finno-Ugorian, haplogroup N1c1, it comes from the Volga region and Ural that is characterized by moving of descendants Rurik presently. Populations of Sweden, Norway or Denmark are not ethnically Finno-Ugorian. In the north of Europe the population with haplogroups R1b1 and R1a1 prevails. The Table of moving Rurikovich The country- Rurikovich
England- 10
The Great Britain- 1
Hungary- 2
Germany- 4
Denmark- 1
Spain- 1
Kazakhstan- 1
Latvia- 1
Mongolia- 1
Norway- 6
Poland- 3
Romania- 1
Russian Federation- 28
Turkey- 1
Sweden- 8
Scotland- 3
Finland- 31
Wales- 1 Traditionalists have written down at present Rurikovich only known Princes of Russian Empire. Descendants of these Princes are included today into the Russian Nobiliary Assembly controlled by the Imperial House of Romanov’s. It is Princes Vadbolsky, Puzyna, Kropotkin, Khilkov, Gagarin and Putyatin. Descendants Gedimin, the founder of the Great Lithuanian Princedom are allocated also. It is Princes Golitsyn, Chartorisky, Khovanskii, Svistunov and some other persons. Thus traditionalists assert that Gediminovich are not Rurikovich. Under political pressure scientists have calculated speed of mutations on one marker on one generation at Romanov’s Princes. She makes for Gediminovich 0.0006 and for Rurikovich 0.00069. Researchers assert, that general ancestor Gedimin and Rurik lived ostensibly in 145 year of our era. Other calculations of this group of scientists give the big speed of mutations – 0.004, that in addition throws into confusion of the detached onlooker. Thus it is well-known, that speed of mutations from the father to the son today makes 0.0024 on one marker on generation. Leaves that speed of mutations at thoroughbred Princes Rurikovich and Gediminovich three times is less, and sometimes twice it is more, than at usual people. This strange thing speaks princely origin Rurik and Gedimin. Though speed of mutations the father/son is true for the average weight of modern people in conditions of uniformity of a population. In fact in interethnic marriages nobody measured speed of mutations. It is obvious, that in case of a birth of children from ethnically different parents speed of mutations will be much higher than average. If to remove shores from eyes and to check up, when the general ancestors at Romanov’s Princes of Russia instead of 1275 for Gediminovich the middle of XVII century will turn out have appeared, i.e. after 1650, and for Rurikovich (Monomakhich) instead of 1053 will leave XV-XVI centuries. If we shall recollect a history appears what exactly at the end of XVII century Rech Pospolitaya has lost the most part of the grounds which went to Russia. Then part Gediminovich has returned to Moskovia, becoming Princes in Russian Empire. All of them for that moment were each other close relatives, therefore them haplotype today are very close to each other, that proves to be true the received genetic data. With Monomakhich also all begins on the places if to take into account, that at Ivan III the Moscow Russia has amplified by war with Great Novgorod and struggle against weak Princes Monomakhich of other branches Rurikovich. And at Ivan Terrible all have been physically destroyed practically specific Princes Rurikovich, is especial from senior branch Monomakhich - Mstislavovich, from senior son Vladimir Monomakh. Disgraced Princes have lost a life, the grounds, titles and position in a society. Their property has got to Ivan Terrible and oprichniks. Only some Princes Mstislavovich still had children who became usual inhabitants of Russia without the corresponding status. Ivan Terrible has spared the close relatives – descendants of Vsevolod Big Jack, grandson of Vladimir Monomakh and son Jury Dolgoruky. These Princes have supported oprichnina of Ivan Terrible and have survived on fire of reprisals. Only a few Monomakhich other branches participated in oprichnina of Ivan Terrible, but they till now were not investigated genetically. The most part kept of Moscow Monomakhich belongs to sort Starodubsky Princes. Their surnames became known only in the middle of XVI century. Family tree of these Princes it has been forged genealogy Romanov’s and the modern engaged scientists. Well-known those patrimonial tree essential blanks till XV century have Princes Monomakhich of Russian Empire, and their real origin is not known. Scientists have scattered these Princes on different branches Monomakhich to give visibility of a variety to origin Romanov’s of Princes. However genetic researches deny falsification of traditional historians. Project Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project [1] has calculated modal haplotype Rurik and Gedimin. Rurik and Vladimir Monomakh have Finno-Ugorian descent – haplogroup N1c1, earlier known as N3a. Them haplotype, probably, begins with the following markers: 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 18 9 9 (15 markers). Gedimin, Great Duke of Lithuania, also belongs to an ethnic group Finno-Ugorian, named Baltic. His genetic haplotype N1c1, probably, begins with markers: 14 23 15 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 15 31 17 9 9 (15 markers). We have shown above, that the certain values of markers modal haplotype Rurik and Gedimin correspond to people, living not earlier than XV century. Therefore it is logical to assume, that modal (base) haplotype are calculated incorrectly. Otherwise traditional researchers would not receive absurd results on speed of mutations of Princes and occurrence of their general ancestor in 145. In fact the hypothesis is known, on which Gedimin (1275-1341) is the descendant of one of Jury Dolgoruky's senior sons (about 1090-1157) and Polock Princess, or one of sons Vsevolod Big Jack (1154-1212). Therefore the general ancestors at Gediminovich and Moscow branch Rurikovich it is Jury Dolgoruky and Vladimir Monomakh from XI-XII centuries, instead of from 145. The second non conventional version of new chronologists [3, 9-10] speaks that according to their reconstruction of events XIV-XVII of centuries, modern Rurikovich are not descendants Rurikovich of the Russ-Horde. They are descendants of "promoted workers" of Distemper and the first decades of board of Romanov’s who "have been written down" in Rurikovich for merits of their nearest ancestors in struggle with genetic Rurikovich. It is ostensibly reflected in structure haplogroup and haplotype Rurikovich. Say, results of testing Rurikovich have excellent confirmed one of key elements of reconstruction NH FiN – change in Russia in XVII century of the top echelon of the military – administrative elite, accompanied falsifications of family trees. In fact on the data [1-2, 6-8] families of lineal descendants Rurik only 9 (+/-1-2) the person that makes 2.9 % from tested Rurikovich. A.N. Tyurin [3] is made unequivocal conclusion: Rurik could not be the carrier haplogroup N1c1. This implies, that 150 haplotype to this haplogroup in sample haplotype Rurikovich are "handicapes". They can be excluded from consideration. In sample [1-2] remain 65 haplotype, from them 39 (60 %) concern to haplogroup R1a1. Therefore new chronologists conclude: Rurik was the carrier haplogroup R1a1 that is the most probable variant. Jacobs there is only a theoretical opportunity of other identification haplogroup Rurik. We believe that are mistaken or intentionally representatives of both points of view – traditional and new chronological mislead. We shall prove this assumption the present research.
| 2. Statement of the research problem In conformity with reconstruction of a history of Russia executed by the author in work [11], a primogenitor of the Sort of Russia and Princes of Russia is the Roman emperor Tit Vespasian Flavius. It is identified by us with primogenitor Hon of the dynasty named subsequently Bulgarian a dynasty the Dulo, by name Tash Bash, son Kubara [12]. Tash Bash was born in 7, and has died in 157 [12]. Ethnically Tash-Bash the representative ancient Ugric or in modern scientific language is Finno-Ugorian (the Ural and Volga region Finns). According to author Tit Vespasian Flavius could die in 185. The first Flavius is the author of idea of Christianity, given Roman Empire in I century. Lineal descendant of Tit Vespasian Flavius is Emperor of New Rome Heraclius Augustus Flavius. According to researches of the author it is identified with Great Hagan Kubrat (570-665), created Great Bulgaria. Descendants of Kubrat-Heraclius were leaders of Varyags and the Vikings who have mastered the north of Europe and Baltic. Lineal descendant of Kubrat is Russ (Urus) Aydar (797-855), in the beginning the Christian, and then Moslem, the founder of Russian Khaganate with capital in Kiev [12] was. Hagan Aydar had Russia of two sons – Djilki (820-882) and Lacyn-Rurik (822-882). Djilki and Rurik were born in Kiev. Senior son Djilki has accepted an Islam and has inherited authority in land of Great Bulgaria, becoming in 855 Hagan of Bulgarian people. Younger son Rurik (Lacyn, the Clear falcon) has inherited a throne of Russia in the city of Prusa, that in 80 km across sea of Marmora from Constantinople. Therefore Rurik was prince of the city of Prusa. Rurik it was necessary to build own power in northern grounds of modern Russia and on Baltic. In fact Kiev, a southern part of modern Ukraine, the Volga region, down to the Ural mountains and Siberia, belonged of Hagan Djilki [12]. In 862 Rurik has come to Ladoga on an appeal of Finno-Ugorian peoples – Chud, Vesi, Sloven and Krivich. Rurik was from the Sort of Russia named Romans if Flavius. In the annals [13] the following is told: « Have told to Russ Chud, Sloven, Krivich and Vesi: Our Earth is great and plentiful, and the order in it is not present. Come to reign and own us. » Old Russian chronics [13] simply mark: « From those Varyags Russian ground was nicknamed ». Since then in Russia dynasty Rurikovich, and in the Volga Bulgaria Saclan a dynasty going from Hagan Djilki corrected. Thus, Hagan Russ Aydar, Djilki and Rurik were ethnically Finno-Ugorian and carriers modal haplotype our research. Descendants Djilki and Rurik should have identical haplotype, in view of features of mutations – east for descendants Djilki and western for Rurikovich. Definition modal haplotype Rurik, Djilki and Aydar will allow to identify Russia base haplotype Kubrat and the first Flavius. Thus we understand that Flavius Ancient and New Rome, Kubrat, Russ Aydar, Saclan dynasty Djilki and Rurikovich are ethnically Finno-Ugorian and have haplogroup N1c1. Monomakhich accordingly are ethnically Finno-Ugorian, XI-XII centuries. Mstislavovich it is Vladimir Monomakh senior branch XII century, going from his senior son Mstislav Great (1070-1132). Sacred David Fedorovich's descendants (?-1321) it is Yaroslavl Princes Mstislavovich Monomakhich Rurikovich. Vsevolodich are younger branch Monomakhich and go through younger son Vladimir Monomah – Jury Dolgoruky, then through Vsevolod Big Jack XII-XIII of a century. Gediminovich there is the younger branch Monomakhich Rurikovich XIII-XIV of a century going through senior children of Jury Dolgoruky. Modern descendants of Princes Rurikovich and Gediminovich Russian Empire have the general ancestor’s not earlier XV-XVI centuries. The most part of people haplogroup N, taken part in genetic researches Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project, are representatives of the Sort of Russia and descendants of Princes of Russia – Rurikovich, Gediminovich, and also Hagan Saclan dynasties. All these people form the Finno-Ugorian people of Russia existing since the most ancient times for territories of modern Russia, and distributed of the Volga region to Central Asia, Caucasus, northern part of the Mediterranean, to Baltic and the north of Eurasia. From an extensive database [1-2] as a comparative material are chosen haplotype twenty person – descendants of Princes of Russian Empire and people, considering itself Rurikovich. Sample includes representatives of the Western Europe and Scandinavia, and also the countries CIS. All examinees have passed testing DNA on 67 markers. For studying results of DNA-GENEALOGIC tests on Kubarev V.V. and Kartsev I.S.'s 67 markers, the founder and the participant of Fund ANRC of Princes, executed by the company Family Tree DNA, USA are in addition given. Haplotype tested people are published on the Internet on an official site of company Family Tree DNA [1]. The list of surnames of participants of research: Wilson, Davidsen, Valikhan Dumshebaev, descendant of Edigey, Galbraith, Hoegseth, Patrakka, Zaytsev, Podolsky, Krawczyk, Kubarev, Chartorisky, Golitsyn, Svistunov, Khovansky, Kartsev, Kropotkin, Khilkov, Gagarin, Putyatin, Puzyna, Vadbolsky. Six people represent Europe; fourteen people represent traditional Russia and two persons from the East. For research it is put questions: to define modal haplotypes of Sorts of Russia, Rurik and the most outstanding representatives of the Sort of Russia.
| 3. Research Research was carried out by the comparative analysis alleles (digital values) loci (sites) DNA on four panels from 67 parameters: the panel 1 (1-12), the panel 2 (13-25), the panel 3 (26-37), the panel 4 (38-47), the panel 4 (48-60) and the panel (61-67) has been generated six tables of panels of loci in the Appendix 3 on six pages. At the top of each table put down values of loci, numbers DYS# and in each cell of the table are accordingly brought values alleles. In tables seven groups haplotype have been generated, depending on values alleles and origins of participants of research. The first modal haplotype has been named Kubrat-Flavius, under it the group where have come Wilson and Davidsen is generated. The following modal haplotype have been named Russia Aydar and Djilki. In second group Djilki have come Valikhan and Edigey. The third group modal haplotype has been named Rurik, in it has come Galbraith. The fourth group modal haplotype is named Mstislav, in it have come Hoesgseth, Patrakka, Zaytsev and Podolsky. The fifth group modal haplotype is named Sacred David Fedorovich (St. David F.), in it have come Krawczyk and Kubarev. The following modal haplotype is named Jury Dolgoruky (Jury Dolgor.) and Gedimin. In the sixth group modal haplotype Gedimin have come Chartorisky, Golitsyn, Svistunov and Khovansky. The seventh modal haplotype is named Vsevolod the Big Jack (Vsevolod B.G.), in it are included Kartsev, Kropotkin, Khilkov, Gagarin, Putyatin, Puzyna and Vadbolsky. Tables close is settlement – theoretical values alleles of modal haplotype Alexander Great (Alexander), Jesus Christ Zlatoust (Jesus Christ), Prophet Mohammed (Mohammed) and Genghis Khan. All of them are ethnic Finno-Ugorian. Alexander the Great it is identified by us with Emperor of New Rome Alexander Great (880-913), cousin of Rurik. Jesus Christ Zlatoust (980-1054) is the son of Princess Maria Vladimirovna (961-1060), daughters Sacred Vladimir Rurikovich (930-1015) and Empresses Anna Macedonian. Prophet Mohammed lived in 1090-1152, and Genghis Khan is in 1162-1227. Researched haplotype have been distributed on groups as follows - in top (more ancient) part of the table have got haplotype with the minimal values alleles, and is closer to the basis of the table - with gradual increase of values alleles. Such distribution haplotype is connected to a hypothesis of the author, that mutations haplotype go from minimally possible values to higher. Thus mutations, both in the positive party and in negative are possible. The main task was to catch the general vector of a direction of mutations haplotype, and then correctly to arrange it on analyzed groups. Thus it is necessary to take into account historical genealogy of everyone haplotype. For example, the major factor in distribution haplotype on groups became the analysis of values DYS# 458, 459a and 459b. On a hypothesis of the author in investigated sample the minimal parameters alleles of modal haplotype correspond to figures 16-9-9. Though in sample there is one haplotype with parameters 15-9-9, but it is, probably, a negative and rare mutation. Then the following levels of mutations are connected to values of the specified parameters 17-9-9 and 18-9-9. The mutation of parameters DYS# 458, 459a and 459b 19-9-9 meets all once, therefore is not special Cluster. Inside each mutation there are the groups determined by minimization of parameter DYS# 458. The following group of mutations for value 16 is the mutation 16-10-10. Then groups 17-9-9, 17-10-10, 18-9-9 and 18-10-10 follow. According to a mutation 16-10-10 and 17-9-9 are not so far apart as mutations 17-10-10, 18-9-9 or 18-10-10. Absolutely distant mutation is appears 19-9-9 and 19-10-10. The second group of taken into account parameters are DYS# 449, 464a, 464b, 464c and 464d. They can change from 28-14-14-15-15 up to 31-14-14-15-15. Then values of combinations DYS# 464a, 464b, 464c and 464d can grow or decrease from 13 up to 16. The following important parameters at distribution haplotype on groups are values alleles in DYS# 570, CDYa and CDYb. The minimal values correspond alleles 18-34-34, then mutations 19-34-34 and 20-34-34 follow, then it is important to take into account values CDYa and CDYb which can grow with 34 up to 35, 36 and 37 and is higher. Parameter DYS# 534 which can change from 16 up to 19 is strongly subject to mutations. The hypothesis of the author about distribution haplotype on groups according to changes DYS# 458, 459a, 459b, 449, 464a, 464b, 464c, 464d, 470, CDYa, CDYb and 543 from the minimal values to higher, has completely justified itself. In the future it will be possible to expand the received tables due to attraction to the analysis of others haplotype Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project [1], using the principles of formation of groups offered in the given work. The analysis of values alleles examinees has shown surprising concurrence of parameters and stability of all groups in the panel 1 (1-12), panels 4 (38-47) and the third part of the panel 4 (61-67). All modal haplotype have shown identical values alleles in these panels of loci: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30 (1-12); 11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10 (38-47); 12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (61-67). Thus, these numbers 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30 (1-12); 11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10 (38-47); 12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (61-67) it is possible to count the universal signature of an accessory tested haplotype to the Sort of Russia. Conformity of the examinee to clans requires specification – or Baltic Varyags and Vikings, or the Lithuanian Russ Gediminovich, or Ancient Russ Rurikovich, or Bulgarian Russ Saclan dynasty or east Russ Genghis Khan only. In any case all candidates who have shown required result, form Finno-Ugorian people of the Sort of Russia and are arias of the Earth. As a hypothesis requiring for experimental acknowledgement in aspect of genetic studying of remains of great representatives of the Sort of Russia, we accept, that up to Hagan Russ Aydar, Great Hagan Kubrat and emperor Flavius Tit Vespasian of mutations modal haplotype was not or they were insignificant. It is possible in case of maintenance of cleanliness of genes in the Sort of Russia by close patrimonial marriages between cousins both second cousins and sisters, and also longevity of ancient people. With X-XI centuries the Sort of Russia has considerably extended, therefore representatives of the Sort began to marry on other tribe brides. In case of the conclusion of interethnic marriages speed of mutations has grown in times, having given rise to process of division modal haplotype on new Sorts in various regions of a planet. Haplotype children of missed marriages began to integrate into itself genic features of the father and mother, therefore haplotype children of the Sort of Russia in the Western and Northern Europe, the Central Europe and Russia, Byzantium, the Volga region, Siberia, Central Asia, the Far East and America began to differ essentially. Studying alleles all panels of loci of examinees has led us to formation modal (base) haplotype Sorts of Russia and his founders - Flavius, Kubrat, Russ Aydar, Djilki and Rurik. Base haplotype for all these persons we count identical, namely: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 970, haplogroup N1c1 (N). As a hypothesis we shall assume, that initial modal haplotype than the first person reasonable spiritual ethnic Finno-Ugorian Russ on one mutation in DYS# 460 is shorter, i.e. not 11, as now, and 10: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-10-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 969, haplogroup N1c1 (N).
Correcting parameters alleles others modal haplotype according to the account of date and a place of their birth, and also probable mutations, we have received theoretical base haplotype the following historic figures (the cursor and underlining mark mutations). Mstislav Great: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-10-10-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 972, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Sacred David Fedorovich: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-10-10-11-12-25-14-19-29-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 974, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Jury Dolgoruky: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-17-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 971, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Gedimin: 14-23-15-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-15-30-17-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-10-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-16-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 973, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Vsevolod Big Jack: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-17-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-14-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 973, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Let's result also calculated theoretical base haplotype outstanding people of Finno-Ugorian people of Russia. Alexander Great: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 970, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Jesus Christ Zlatoust: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 970, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Prophet Mohammed: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-10-10-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-14-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 973, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Genghis Khan: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-10-10-11-12-25-14-19-29-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-14-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 974, haplogroup N1c1 (N). Our theoretical researches can be confirmed or denied genetic tests of remains of Princes of Sacred Russia in Ukraine (Kiev) and Russia (Moscow). It is necessary to investigate also power or traces body in a tomb Alexander the Great (Istanbul) in Turkey, artifacts Kubrat (Pereshepino treasure, the Hermitage, Russia), Jesus Christ Zlatoust's biomaterials (a crown of thorns, the Cathedral of the Parisian Mother of god and the Turin Shroud), hair of Prophet Mohammed (Mosque Umayyad, Damascus, Syria) and remains of descendants Genghis Khan (Russia, the countries CIS). By results of the analysis of parameters alleles 22 tested and theoretically designed alleles modal haplotype Princes of the Sort of Russia the Table of genetic distances (the Appendix 4) has been made. For initial, base haplotype Sorts of Russia have been taken haplotype under name Kubrat-Flavius, dated by VI century. To them corresponded modal haplotype Russ Aydar, Djilki, Rurik, Alexander the Great and Jesus Christ Zlatoust. The table of genetic distances repeats the list tested haplotype and modal haplotype Princes of Russia. In the right part of the table are placed colon on panels of loci DNA, from the panel 1 and up to the panel 6 (the third part of the fourth panel of loci). Each panel is described by the sum forming her allele’s examinees (the sum of values Σ) and a difference of values alleles with modal value in each group in view of a sign on mutations (a difference Δ). The most right column of the table includes values of a total sum of values alleles (Σ) and a genetic distance between the sum alleles the examinee and the sum allele’s group modal haplotype (Δ1). The second genetic distance in the same colon is the sum of any single-step mutations of the examinee without taking into account their sign to group modal haplotype (Δ2), and, at last, the third, absolute genetic distance, is the sum of any single-step mutations of the examinee without taking into account their sign to modal haplotype Sorts of Russia Kubrat-Flavius and Rurik (Δ3). The analysis of the Table of genetic distances allows defining the leaders most close to modal haplotype, with the minimal mutations. The list of leaders: 1. Vadbolsky (7);
2. Kartsev (7);
3. Kubarev (9);
4. Galbraith (9);
5. Krawczyk (10). It is possible to define also leaders in each subgroup with a minimum quantity of local mutations: 1. Kubarev (5);
2. Krawczyk (6);
3. Vadbolsky (7);
4. Kartsev (8);
5. Svistunov (8). The general list of examinees in process of removal from modal haplo: 1. Vadbolsky (7); 7. Khilkov (12); 13. Khovansky (15); 19. Zaytsev (17);
2. Kartsev (7); 8. Gagarin (13); 14. Podolsky (15); 20. Patrakka (18);
3. Kubarev (9); 9. Chartorisky (14); 15. Putyatin (15); 21. Puzyna (19);
4. Galbraith (9); 10. Kropotkin (14); 16. Edigey (15); 22. Valikhan (20).
5. Krawczyk (10); 11. Davidsen (14); 17. Wilson (16);
6. Svistunov (12); 12. Golitsyn (15); 18. Hoegseth (17); Average value of mutations at the five of leaders is equally 8.4 markers. Average value of mutations of all examinees is equally 13.8 markers. At age of generation of 25 years and date of birth Rurik at 822 we shall receive (2010-822)/25-1=46 generation, and at age of generation 34 years – 34 generations. Speed of mutations on 67 markers at leaders will be in the first case 0.0027 markers on generation, in the second case – 0.0037 markers on generation. Average speed of mutations at all examinees will be accordingly 0.0044 and 0.006 markers on generation. The received given speeds of mutations not bad correspond to modern speed of mutations the father/son 0.0024 on 12 markers, however nobody knows speed of mutations the father/son on 67 markers. It is necessary to understand, that speed of mutations checking in the beginning of XXI century, and she could vary in the past depending on an epoch and an ethnic accessory of pair father / mother. The normal quantity of mutations of markers Rurikovich for 1200 lays in limits from 12 up to 14, that gives one mutation of a marker for hundred years, in other words – one mutation of a marker in three-four generations.
| 4. Conclusions Research haplotype the examinees taken from database Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project [1-2] and data on V.V. Kubarev (Appendix 3) and I.S. Kartsev (Appendix 4), have shown an accessory of all examinees to the Sort of Russia, ethnically Finno-Ugorian haplogroup N (N1c1). Twenty examinees belong to Rurikovich. Two examinees belong to Saclan dynasty of Bulgarian the Tsars, going from Hagan Djilki, senior brother of Rurik. There is a probability of that examinees Valikhan and Edigey are descendants Genghis Khan, also is Rurikovich. For division of descendants Saclan dynasty and Genghis Khan while there is no sufficient statistical material. By us it is determined modal haplotype Rurik: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-11-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 970, haplogroup N1c1 (N). It is calculated also probable initial, base haplotype Sorts of Russ: 14-23-14-11-11-13-11-12-10-14-14-30-16-9-9-11-12-25-14-19-28-14-14-15-15-10-11-18-20-14-15-16-18-34-34-13-10-11-8-15-17-8-8-10-8-11-10-12-21-22-13-10-12-12-16-7-13-20-21-15-12-11-10-11-11-12-11 (1-67), the sum alleles 969, haplogroup N1c1 (N). The best results researched haplotype Sorts of Russ and Rurikovich have confirmed theoretical settlement speed of mutations on one marker on one generation. She has made 0.0027 at Rurikovich on 67 markers and 0.0024 at modern generation the father/son. In historical prospect average speed of mutations at examinees Rurikovich does not exceed 0.0044 markers on generation on 67 markers. Normal speed of mutations on 67 markers should make at pairs the father/son not less than 0.006 markers on generation. The quantity of mutations of markers at modern descendants Rurikovich can change with 7 up to 19. Average value of mutations in markers makes 13. Average value of mutations at descendants of titled Princes of Russian Empire 13. The purest descendants Rurik and Sorts of Russia appeared Vadbolsky, Kartsev, Kubarev, Krawczyk and Galbraith. Descendants of Princes Rurikovich known in Russian Empire are narrow family group of younger branch Rurikovich-Monomakhich of the Moscow Princes going from Vsevolod Big Jack in XII-XIII centuries. Besides they have appeared in a historiography during Distemper in Russia at Ivan Terrible (Moscow Grand Duke) in the middle of XVI century. The analysis of the genetic data confirms this opinion. Gediminovich in Russian Empire there was the narrow family group which has got to Russia not earlier of the middle of XVII century, and becoming Princes of Russian Empire not earlier than XVIII centuries. The general ancestor Russian Gediminovich lived not earlier than XV centuries. There is a whole latent group of descendants of the senior branch Rurikovich-Monomakhich going from Mstislav Great in XI-XII centuries. The group of descendants of Sacred David Fedorovich Jaroslavsky living in XIV century is revealed. These people have received inflow of genes Genghis Khan from Golden Horde as a result of Sacred Feodor Rostislavovich's marriage on Anna, daughter of Mengu Temir. Descendants of Prince Mstislav Great have not confirmed the princely titles at Romanov’s in Russian Empire therefore they were simple peasants or the priests becoming in most cases noblemen. The latent group of descendants of the Sort of Russia, going from Djilki, senior brother Rjurika is revealed. They represent so-called Saclan dynasty of Bulgarian of the Tsars, supervised tribes of Golden Horde. Probably, they are descendants Genghis Khan and Batyi, based Golden Horde. Ethnically all examinees are Finno-Ugorian it is come from Russia. The significant groups of the western representatives of the Sort of Russia and Rurikovich which in the remote past have remained on Baltic is revealed or have moved to the Western Europe. Rurikovich were settled from Scandinavia up to British Isles and Spain. A plenty of descendants of the Sort of Russ and Rurikovich in Finland speaks us resettlement there many Novgorodian after route of Great Novgorod Moscow Princes is Ivan III and Ivan VI Terrible in XV-XVI centuries. Distribution of the Sort of Russ and Rurikovich on light speak that our reconstruction of a history [11] confirmed Bulgarian chronicles [12], is true and based on the assumption, that Rurik the younger son of Bulgarian reigning Russ Aydar, the grandson of emperor of New Rome of Constantine Blind (Karanjar of Bulgarian annals [12]). Rurik was born in Kiev in 822 when Russ Aydar there corrected. Kiev was capital of Russ Khaganat. Scandinavian and Norman versions of origin of Rurik are erroneous. Original place of occurrence of ancestors of Rurik and Sorts of Russ this is northern Volga region, in hundred – other of kilometers on northeast from modern Moscow. The Sort of Russ was settled on the world from the Volga region – has got to the Western, Central and Northern Europe, in region of Mediterranean Sea, Central Asia, India, China, Southeast Asia and America. Modal haplotype of Rurik is base haplotype of all Princes of the Sort of Russ which has given the world elite of Russian people, Bulgarian people and many outstanding people of the Earth. By us also have been designed modal haplotype of Flavius, Kubrat, Alexander Great, Jesus Christ Zlatoust, Prophet Mohammed and Genghis Khan.
Appendices
|
Appendix 1. A copy of the Certificate of the DNA-GENEALOGIC test of Kubarev Valeriy Viktorovich, who has been written out by the company Family Tree DNA, USA on November 13, 2010.
|
Appendix 2. A copy of the Certificate of the DNA-GENEALOGIC test of Kartsev Ivan Sergeevich, who has been written out by the company Family Tree DNA, USA on November 10, 2010.
|
Appendix 3. Tables of panels of loci tested for 6 sheets.
APPENDIX 3 PANEL 1 (1-12) Locus 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
DYS# 393 390 19* 391 385a 385b 426 388 439 389-1 392 389-2
Alleles
Kubrat–Flavius 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Wilson 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Davidsen 14 24 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Russ Aydar 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Djilki 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Valikhan 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Edigey 14 23 14 11 11 14 11 12 10 14 14 30
Rurik 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Galbraith 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Mstislav 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Hoesgseth 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 13 14 28
Patrakka 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 11 13 14 29
Zaytsev 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Podolski 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
St. David F. 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
R. Krawczyk 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 31
V. Kubarev 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Jury Dolgor. 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Gedimin 14 23 15 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 15 30
К. K. Chartorisky 14 23 15 11 11 13 11 12 11 14 15 30
Golitsyn 14 23 15 11 11 13 11 12 11 14 15 30
Svistunov 14 23 15 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 15 30
Khovanskii 14 23 15 11 11 13 11 12 10 15 15 31
Vsevolod B. J. 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
I. Kartcev 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
A. Kropotkin 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
B. Khilkov 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
A. Gagarin 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
A. Putyatin 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 31
J. Puzyna 14 23 14 10 11 13 11 12 11 13 14 29
Vadbolsky 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Alexander 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Jesus Christ 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Mohammed 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30
Gengiz Khan 14 23 14 11 11 13 11 12 10 14 14 30 PANEL 2 (13-25) Locus 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
DYS# 458 459a 459b 455 454 447 437 448 449 464a** 464b** 464c** 464d**
Alleles Kubrat–Flavius 16 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Wilson 16 9 9 11 13 26 14 19 29 13 13 14 14
Davidsen 16 9 9 11 12 25 15 19 29 14 14 15 15
Russ Aydar 16 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Djilki 16 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Valikhan 17 10 10 11 12 25 14 20 29 15 15 15 15
Edigey 17 10 10 11 12 25 13 19 31 14 14 15 15
Rurik 16 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Galbraith 16 9 9 11 13 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Mstislav 16 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Hoesgseth 16 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 15 15
Patrakka 17 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 30 14 14 15 15
Zaytsev 17 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 30 14 15 15 15
Podolski 17 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 15 15
St. David F. 16 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 15 15
R. Krawczyk 16 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 31 14 14 15 15
V. Kubarev 16 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 31 14 14 15 15
Jury Dolg. 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Gedimin 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
К. K. Chartorisky 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 15 15
Golitsyn 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Svistunov 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Khovanskii 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 27 14 14 15 15
Vsevolod B. J. 17 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
I. Kartcev 18 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
A. Kropotkin 18 9 9 11 12 24 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
B. Khilkov 18 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 15 15
A. Gagarin 18 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 15 15 15
A. Putyatin 18 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 30 14 14 15 15
J. Puzyna 18 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 14 14
Vadbolsky 18 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 27 14 14 15 15
Alexander 16 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Jesus Christ 16 9 9 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Mohammed 16 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 28 14 14 15 15
Gengiz Khan 16 10 10 11 12 25 14 19 29 14 14 15 15 PANEL 3 (26-37) Locus 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
DYS# 460 GATA H4 YCA II a YCA II b 456 607 576 570 CDY a CDY b 442 438
Alleles
Kubrat–Flavius 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Wilson 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 14 10
Davidsen 11 11 18 20 14 15 17 17 35 35 15 10
Russ Aydar 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Djilki 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Valikhan 11 11 18 20 14 16 16 18 35 35 12 10
Edigey 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 20 35 35 14 10
Rurik 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Galbraith 10 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 14 10
Mstislav 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Hoesgseth 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 19 34 36 14 10
Patrakka 11 11 18 20 13 15 17 20 34 34 14 10
Zaytsev 11 11 18 20 15 14 17 19 35 35 12 10
Podolski 11 11 18 20 14 15 18 19 36 36 13 10
St. David F. 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
R. Krawczyk 11 11 18 20 14 15 15 18 34 34 12 11
V. Kubarev 11 11 18 20 14 16 17 18 34 34 13 10
Jury Dolgor. 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Gedimin 10 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
К. K. Chartorisky 10 11 18 20 13 14 15 18 36 36 14 10
Golitsyn 10 11 18 20 13 14 15 19 36 36 14 10
Svistunov 10 11 18 20 13 14 15 19 36 36 13 10
Khovanskii 10 11 18 20 13 14 15 18 36 36 14 10
Vsevolod B. J. 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 14 10
I. Kartcev 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 36 36 13 10
A. Kropotkin 12 11 18 20 14 15 16 19 34 34 15 10
B. Khilkov 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 19 34 34 15 10
A. Gagarin 12 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 14 10
A. Putyatin 11 10 18 20 14 14 15 19 34 35 14 10
J. Puzyna 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 19 34 34 15 9
Vadbolsky 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 19 34 34 15 10
Alexander 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Jesus Christ 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Mohammed 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10
Gengiz Khan 11 11 18 20 14 15 16 18 34 34 13 10 PANEL 4 (38 - 47) Locus 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
DYS# 531 578 395S1a 395S1b 590 537 641 472 406S1 511
Alleles
Kubrat–Flavius 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Wilson 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Davidsen 11 6 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Russ Aydar 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Djilki 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Valikhan 11 8 15 17 8 8 11 8 12 9
Edigey 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Rurik 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Galbraith 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Mstislav 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Hoesgseth 11 8 15 18 8 8 10 8 11 10
Patrakka 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Zaytsev 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Podolski 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
St. David F. 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
R. Krawczyk 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
V. Kubarev 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Jury Dolgor. 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Gedimin 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
К. K. Chartorisky 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Golitsyn 11 8 15 17 8 9 10 8 11 10
Svistunov 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Khovanskii 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Vsevolod B. J. 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
I. Kartcev 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 10 10
A. Kropotkin 11 8 15 18 8 8 10 8 11 10
B. Khilkov 11 8 15 18 8 8 10 8 11 10
A. Gagarin 11 8 15 18 8 8 10 8 11 10
A. Putyatin 11 8 15 18 8 8 10 8 11 10
J. Puzyna 11 8 15 18 8 8 10 8 11 10
Vadbolsky 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 10 10
Alexander 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Jesus Christ 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Mohammed 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10
Gengiz Khan 11 8 15 17 8 8 10 8 11 10 PANEL 4 (48 - 60) Locus 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
DYS# 425 413a 413b 557 594 436 490 534 450 444 481 520 446
Alleles
Kubrat–Flavius 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Wilson 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 18 7 13 20 22 16
Davidsen 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 18 7 13 20 21 16
Russ Aydar 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Djilki 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Valikhan 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 18 7 14 21 21 15
Edigey 12 20 22 14 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Rurik 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Galbraith 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 19 7 13 20 21 16
Mstislav 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Hoesgseth 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 19 7 12 20 21 15
Patrakka 12 22 22 14 10 12 12 17 7 13 21 21 16
Zaytsev 12 21 21 13 10 12 12 15 7 13 20 21 14
Podolski 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 18 7 13 20 21 16
St. David F. 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
R. Krawczyk 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
V. Kubarev 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 17 7 13 20 21 15
Jury Dolgor. 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Gedimin 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 16
К. K. Chartorisky 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 16
Golitsyn 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 16
Svistunov 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 16
Khovanskii 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 16
Vsevolod B. J. 12 20 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
I. Kartcev 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
A. Kropotkin 12 20 22 14 10 12 12 19 7 13 21 21 16
B. Khilkov 12 20 22 14 10 12 12 18 7 13 21 21 16
A. Gagarin 12 22 22 14 10 12 12 18 7 12 21 21 15
A. Putyatin 12 20 22 14 10 12 12 17 7 13 21 21 16
J. Puzyna 12 20 22 14 10 12 12 18 7 13 21 21 16
Vadbolsky 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Alexander 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Jesus Christ 12 21 22 13 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Mohammed 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15
Gengiz Khan 12 21 22 14 10 12 12 16 7 13 20 21 15 PANEL 4 (61 - 67) Locus 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
DYS# 617 568 487 572 640 492 565
Alleles
Kubrat–Flavius 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Wilson 11 11 10 11 11 14 11
Davidsen 11 11 10 11 11 12 11
Russ Aydar 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Djilki 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Valikhan 12 11 10 11 12 13 11
Edigey 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Rurik 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Galbraith 11 11 10 11 11 12 11
Mstislav 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Hoesgseth 12 11 10 11 11 13 11
Patrakka 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Zaytsev 12 11 10 12 11 12 11
Podolski 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
St. David F. 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
R. Krawczyk 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
V. Kubarev 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Jury Dolgor. 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Gedimin 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
К. K. Chartorisky 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Golitsyn 12 11 10 11 11 13 11
Svistunov 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Khovanskii 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Vsevolod B. J. 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
I. Kartcev 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
A. Kropotkin 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
B. Khilkov 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
A. Gagarin 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
A. Putyatin 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
J. Puzyna 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Vadbolsky 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Alexander 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Jesus Christ 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Mohammed 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Gengiz Khan 12 11 10 11 11 12 11
Appendix 4. The table of genetic distances.
APPENDIX 4 THE TABLE OF GENETIC DISTANCES PANEL 1 PANEL 2 PANEL 3 PANEL 4 PANEL 5 PANEL 6 Sum
Σ Δ Σ Δ Σ Δ Σ Δ Σ Δ Σ Δ Σ Δ 1Δ 2 Δ 3
Kubrat–Flavius 177 0 201 0 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 970 0 0 0
Wilson 177 0 200 -1 215 1 106 0 199 5 79 1 977 7 16 16
Davidsen 178 1 203 2 218 4 106 0 198 4 77 -1 980 10 14 14
Russ Aydar 177 0 201 0 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 970 0 0 0
Djilki 177 0 201 0 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 970 0 0 0
Valikhan 177 0 208 7 216 2 106 0 199 5 80 2 986 16 20 20
Edigey 178 1 207 6 219 5 106 0 194 0 78 0 982 12 15 15
Rurik 177 0 201 0 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 970 0 0 0
Galbraith 177 0 202 1 214 0 106 0 199 5 77 -1 975 5 9 9
Mstislav 177 0 203 2 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 972 2 2 2
Hoesgseth 174 -3 204 1 218 4 107 1 197 3 79 1 979 7 15 17
Patrakka 176 -1 206 3 217 3 106 0 199 5 78 0 982 10 16 18
Zaytsev 177 0 208 4 217 3 106 0 191 -3 79 1 977 5 15 17
Podolski 177 0 205 2 221 7 106 0 198 4 78 0 985 13 13 15
St. David F. 177 0 204 1 214 0 106 0 195 1 78 0 974 2 3 4
R. Krawczyk 178 1 206 2 213 -1 106 0 195 0 78 0 976 2 6 10
V. Kubarev 177 0 206 2 216 2 106 0 196 1 78 0 979 5 5 9
Jury Dolgor. 177 0 202 1 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 971 1 1 1
Gedimin 179 2 202 0 213 -1 106 0 195 1 78 0 973 2 4 5
K. Chartorisky 180 1 203 1 215 2 106 0 195 0 78 0 977 5 10 14
Golitsyn 180 1 202 0 216 3 106 0 195 0 79 1 978 6 11 15
Svistunov 179 0 202 0 215 2 106 0 195 0 78 0 975 3 8 12
Khovanskii 181 2 201 -1 215 2 106 0 195 0 78 0 976 4 11 15
Vsevolod B. J. 177 0 202 1 215 1 106 0 194 0 78 0 973 2 1 3
I. Kartcev 177 0 203 1 218 3 105 -1 195 1 78 0 976 3 8 7
A. Kropotkin 177 0 202 0 218 3 107 1 200 6 78 0 982 9 11 14
B. Khilkov 177 0 204 2 217 2 107 1 199 5 78 0 982 9 9 12
A. Gagarin 177 0 205 3 216 1 107 1 199 5 78 0 981 8 11 13
A. Putyatin 178 1 205 3 214 -1 107 1 198 4 78 0 980 7 13 15
J. Puzyna 175 -2 205 3 216 1 107 1 199 5 78 0 980 7 15 19
Vadbolsky 177 0 201 -1 217 2 105 -1 194 0 78 0 973 0 7 7
Alexander 177 0 201 0 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 970 0 0 0
Jesus Christ 177 0 201 0 214 0 106 0 194 0 78 0 970 0 0 0
Mohammed 177 0 203 2 214 0 106 0 195 1 78 0 973 3 3 3
Gengiz Khan 177 0 204 3 214 0 106 0 195 1 78 0 974 4 4 4 The text of Appendices 3-4 in Word file:b>
6164.doc |
Sources of the information
[1] Rurikid Dynasty DNA Project.
http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rurikid/default.aspx?section=yresults
Site FamilyTreeDNA http://www.familytreedna.com/ [2] Bazhor Andrzej (Andrzej Bajor), Summary table Y-DNA (37 markers) on Rurikovich. http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mozhayski/teksty/ydna.html [3] Tjurin A.M., Rurikovich (genicgenealogy aspect). 2010.
http://supernovum.ru/public/index.php?doc=161 [4] Tjurin A.M., 2010, Speeds of mutations of Tjurin A.M. "Transmission", the "evolutionary" and "designed" speeds of mutations of loci haplotype Y-chromosome.s http://new.chronologia.org/volume10/turin_mutation.php the Electronic collection of clauses New Chronology. Release 10.2010. [5] Klyosov A.A., Substantive provisions of DNA-GENEALOGY (chromosome Y), speeds of mutations, their calibration and examples of calculations. The bulletin of the Russian Academy of DNA-GENEALOGY. 2008.1, №2, 252-348. Michael Temosh's Storefront. http://stores.lulu.com/temosh [6] Dumin S.V., president of RGF, chairman IPO, d.c. and secretary general MGA (GIM, IPO, RNA, Moscow). Genealogy and genetics: new opportunities and horizons. XVII Savelov’s readings, Genealogy and genetics. Moscow, Historical museum, December 10-11, 2010. [7] Bazjor Andrzej, the head of international project Rurikovich (the coordinator of researches from the Polish party) (Warsaw, Poland), Volkov Vladimir Gennadjevich, chef of exposition-exhibition department of the Museum of history of Tomsk (the Museum of a history of Tomsk, the Tomsk Genealogical society Herald). Origin Rurik and Gedimin in view of last genetic researches. XVII Savelov’s readings, Genealogy and genetics. Moscow, Historical museum, December 10-11, 2010. [8] Zhuravlyov-Seslavin Andrey Nikolaevich, the head of international project Rurikovich (the coordinator of researches from the Russian party), member of the Society of descendants of participants of war 1812 (Moscow). Genealogy of Rurikovich. Genetic aspect. XVII Savelov’s readings, Genealogy and genetics. Moscow, Historical museum, December 10-11, 2010. [9] Nosovskij G.V., Fomenko A.T. New chronology of Russia. Russia. England. Byzantium. Rome. (In three volumes). Print house RIMIS. 2005. http://www.chronologia.org/xpon4/index.html. A site of the project New Chronology. http://www.chronologia.org. [10] Nosovskij G.V., Fomenko A.T. Beginning of Horde Russia. Publishing house of nuclear heating plant together with Unknown planet. 2005. http://www.chronologia.org/ord_rus/index.html. A site of the project New Chronology. http://www.chronologia.org. [11] Kubarev V.V., Vedas of Russ, M., IP Media, Inc. 2009. [12] Bahshi Iman, Jagfar Tarihy (Annals of Jagfar) Gazi-Baraj Tarihy (Annals of Gazi-Baraj), I - III volume. [13] Nestor, Story of Time Years.
On December 23, 2010 Grand Prince Valeriy Viktorovich Kubarev
The text of the report in Word a file:
6166.doc
|
V.V. Kubarev's report Genealogy and genetics of Princes of Russia:
|
The working moment of XXI Conference it is V.A. Ivanov and I.V. Davidenko:
|
|